Loading page …

Waiting: 0 s · This view updates automatically.

Trayyce security check for trayyce.io, current public audit, no security guarantee

UMR Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie (bfp.bordeaux-aquitaine.hub.inrae.fr): security check grade F · Trayyce

All providers

Other websites

UMR Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie

Security grade: F20/100
Feedback grade: None yet
Known breaches: 0
Network: AS2200FR-RENATER - Renater, FR · website hosted here
Last checked: 15 Nov 2026, 10:45 CET

Official website ↗View report Write a review

At a glance

UMR Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie (bfp.bordeaux-aquitaine.hub.inrae.fr) scored grade F (20 of 100 points) in the public Trayyce security check on 15/11/2026. It has been below grade B since the check on 15/11/2026.

Editorial
No entry
The editors have published nothing about this website.
History
1 check
The next check starts a history.
Feedback
No reviews yet
Customers can write the first one here.
Write a review

Below grade B: important safeguards are missing

According to our checks this website has been below grade B since 15/11/2026, last checked on 15/11/2026, currently grade F. The report lists the missing safeguards.

View findings →

Reviews

Write a review

The feedback grade comes from reviews submitted on Trayyce and confirmed by e-mail, from three reviews on: A+ from an average of 4.8 stars, A from 4.5, B from 4.0, C from 3.5, D from 3.0, E from 2.0, below that F. We do not verify whether someone was a customer. Reviews on Google, Trustpilot or ProvenExpert are shown separately in the profile and are not included. In the default order the feedback grade does not change the rank.

No reviews yet. Customers can write the first one here; it is published after e-mail confirmation. After claiming, owners can connect Google, Trustpilot and ProvenExpert.

Is this provider a good fit?

Specialities as described by the provider. Check scope and terms on their website.

Security check

20/100

Grade F · 15 Nov 2026, 10:45 CET

View measurement and findings

This measures the website configuration, not client project quality or support.

The position in the ranking follows only this grade in the default order. Reviews, claiming and projects appear in the profile and do not change it there. Sorting by feedback gives a separate order.

Many of the missing protections are a single line in the server configuration and quick to add. That alone does not prove a vulnerability. It does show how much attention the operator pays to the topic. What you conclude from that is up to you.

The grade measures only the website configuration at the time of the check. Large providers like Google have huge teams and sometimes must support old devices – grades of different providers are therefore not directly comparable. What missing protection can mean

Known data breaches

Verified incidents in the Have I Been Pwned catalogue for inrae.fr.

Catalogue checked: 16 Nov 2026, 00:30 CET

Zero is not evidence that a breach has never occurred. Other brand or group domains are not included. The website rating is independent of this count.

Have I Been Pwned · CC BY 4.0 ↗

Is this your company? Claim this profile for free and manage logo, description and review sources yourself. You need an account and proof of the domain. Claim profile →

Automatically discovered · source ↗