Waiting: 0 s · This view updates automatically.
Other websites
hosting-community.de scored grade F (20 of 100 points) in the public Trayyce security check on 15/11/2026. It has been below grade B since the check on 15/11/2026. The Trayyce editorial team has published a documented entry: “Listed providers average 54 out of 100 points, criticism on Discord with calls for bans and insults responded to” (15/11/2026).
Editorial
1 entry
Listed providers average 54 out of 100 points, criticism on Discord with calls for bans and insults responded to
Research and sourcesHistory
1 check
The next check starts a history.
Feedback
No reviews yet
Customers can write the first one here.
Write a reviewAccording to our checks this website has been below grade B since 15/11/2026, last checked on 15/11/2026, currently grade F. The report lists the missing safeguards.
View findings →Editorial · not part of the scan
Editorial entries by Trayyce about this domain, such as publicly documented incidents or reports. They are not part of the automated check and do not change the grade. An entry marked as a warning moves the provider to the end of its grade group in the ranking, a positive one to the front. Each entry lists its sources. Trayyce is operated privately by Leon Dahmke; the DDevelopment website belongs to it. The DDevelopment website is checked by the same rule as any other and ranked by the same rules, without preference.
Consumer note
Disclosure: Trayyce is owned by the operator whose posts are discussed in this entry. hosting-community.de is a comparison portal for hosting providers with its own Discord. The site lists 37 providers (public list, read on 15.11.2026). For 11 of them, there is a Trayyce rating: five times B (CitexNode, Deinserverhost, Prepaid-Host, Respawnhost, Schleyer-EDV), once C (SKRIME), twice E (Netzliving, Trivox) and three times F (EDV-Hosting, Host-Zentrum, VpsLayer), with an average of 54.1 out of 100 points. None of the 11 achieve A. For the remaining 26, there is no review yet. In the #tech-talk channel of the Discord, Trayyce pointed out missing security headers from providers on 11.11.2026. The responses: - The owner of Evolushost, himself a team member of the Hosting Community, wrote that these headers only restricted flexibility and had no benefit for the operator (see entry for evolushost.com, there F grade, none of the six headers). - The operator of Darkstone twice demanded that the critic be banned. In the following days, Trayyce was referred to in the same channel as "Downie", "idiot" and "trash". A member wrote, referencing a Trustpilot review: "Even Avoro wasn't safe from him", another that anyone who only posts negative reviews should be deleted from Trustpilot. Moderation of these posts is not visible on the screenshots. On 13.11. the mockery was directed against a public post by Trayyce on X from 10.11.: There, Trayyce had asked OpenAI if an AI agency that advertises itself as an "official OpenAI partner" is actually a partner. The operator of Darkstone wrote about it "What's wrong with the bird?" and "and above all stop being crap xd". Another member implied that the operator of Trayyce is "very autistic" and advised to ignore him, "then it might resolve itself quickly on its own". A response from OpenAI to the post is not visible on the screenshots. The Official Partner Verification link could not confirm a partnership. On 14.11. a member of Trayyce additionally publicly attacked X ("fix your own website", their own page had "only … an B"). Measured at that time, trayyce.io had a grade of A+ (report from 13.11., 21:15 Uhr). The accusation picks up on a measurement that existed: On 13.11. trayyce.io was under attack; in the course of this, there is an entry with grade B from 16:16 to 20:15 Uhr, which among other things lacked HSTS (report ddxxiLb4EaljIqUofYuuZA). If a page is running in the "Under-Attack" mode of a protection service, the service itself responds - the security headers of the actual page do not reach the visitor, and the check evaluates what is received. Layer-7-DDoS protection and HTTP hardening are two separate construction sites: one filters attack traffic, the headers protect the visitor's browser. The operator of Darkstone confused these two things in a public post in which he wanted to attack Trayyce. Since 13.11., 20:15 Uhr, trayyce.io has been consistently measuring A+. A note on fairness: In the same channel, other members also wrote that CSP headers were "already important". The tone of our page was also partly sharp.
The feedback grade comes from reviews submitted on Trayyce and confirmed by e-mail, from three reviews on: A+ from an average of 4.8 stars, A from 4.5, B from 4.0, C from 3.5, D from 3.0, E from 2.0, below that F. We do not verify whether someone was a customer. Reviews on Google, Trustpilot or ProvenExpert are shown separately in the profile and are not included. In the default order the feedback grade does not change the rank.
No reviews yet. Customers can write the first one here; it is published after e-mail confirmation. After claiming, owners can connect Google, Trustpilot and ProvenExpert.
Specialities as described by the provider. Check scope and terms on their website.
Is this your company? Claim this profile for free and manage logo, description and review sources yourself. You need an account and proof of the domain. Claim profile →
Listed because someone checked this website with the website check or searched for it here.
Translated automatically from German. The German original is authoritative.
@Trayyceio is getting attacked after trashtalking multiple german hosting providers and now gets help of Cloudflare to keep their Website reachable. A Cybersecurity Company btw.
Sources